8th October 2006 Stumble it!

Blogs for a Reality Check

posted in Blogs4Bush by themaiden |

Mark Noonan, one of Blogs for Bush’s top noisemakers, has offered us a Reality Check to counter the conventional wisdom that something is horribly wrong with the GOP. He suggests that rather than look at the polls, the news reports, the pundits and such, we look at what people are doing. Fair enough, but history has shown that when Mark starts talking about ‘reality’ it is a very good idea to look into thing a little deeper since for Mark, ‘reality’ seems to mean what he wishes to believe, or, perhaps, what he is paid to believe. I’d bet on the former, though, in all fairness.

First on Mark’s list, and I’d say this is his primary point, is that people are joining the military. 1.6 million people, he claims, have joined the military since 9/11 but, more significantly, recruitment numbers are actually up since 2005. This means, of course that war really isn’t unpopular at all, despite virtually all the evidence to the contrary.

This is something whcih would not be happening if the war were unpopular. Period. No, there is no other explanation other than the continued popularity of the liberation of Iraq and the larger War on Terrorism to explain not just the raw numbers of volunteers, but also the fact that more people joined the mliitary in 2006 than did in 2005.

Reality Check

Now, Mark neglects to mention the source of his numbers, but the numbers I’ve found show a 48,743 recruit decline between 2005 and 2006. This, despite a tremendous, and expensive, advertising push started several years back.

This triumphant stance conceals a more grim reality. In its 2003 Government Accounting Office (GAO) Report, the Pentagon stated that “convincing young adults to join the military has become more difficult.” At the same time, the Department of Defense’s budget for recruiting reached a record $4 billion for the fiscal year 2003 according to a Government Accounting Office report, and the portion of that budget devoted to advertising nearly doubled in the past five years, from $299 million in 1998 to $592 million in 2003. In the same period, the Army alone increased its advertising spending by 73 percent to $197 million, and the Air Force the same budget by 395 percent to $90.5 million. The advertising cost per new enlisted recruit has nearly tripled from $640 in 1990 to almost $1,900 last year.

Recruiting At Any Cost

Numbers are dropping despite 20,000 dollar signing bonuses that have been in place since 2005 or so, which, of course, make no difference to those wishing to join.

Pinkerton, 26, enlisted Friday and will leave Wednesday for basic training at Fort Benning, Ga. He received a $14,000 bonus for choosing an infantry job. He received another $6,000 for agreeing to leave for basic training so soon.

U.S. Army again raises enlistment bonuses

The numbers are dropping even though the Army now accepts less than upstanding citizens.

In February, the Baltimore Sun wrote that there was “a significant increase in the number of recruits with what the Army terms ‘serious criminal misconduct‘ in their background” — a category that included “aggravated assault, robbery, vehicular manslaughter, receiving stolen property and making terrorist threats.” From 2004 to 2005, the number of those recruits rose by more than 54 percent, while alcohol and illegal drug waivers, reversing a four-year decline, increased by more than 13 percent.

U.S. is recruiting misfits for army
Felons, racists, gang members fill in the ranks

I especially like the phrase “making terrorist threats”.

Perhaps staffing the military– that is, organizations whose missions require the carrying of guns– with thugs could have consequences?

One beneficiary of the Army’s new moral-waiver policies gained a certain prominence this summer. After Steven Green, who served in the 101st Airborne Division, was charged in a rape and quadruple murder in Mahmudiyah, Iraq, it was disclosed that he had been “a high-school dropout from a broken home who enlisted to get some direction in his life, yet was sent home early because of an anti-social personality disorder.”

U.S. is recruiting misfits for army
Felons, racists, gang members fill in the ranks

Yes, it seems that it does.

And, as if the picture isn’t already pretty poor, the military could be twiddling with the numbers.

Now, lets see what else “people are doing” that might shed some light on the state of things.

Hmmmm…..

Soldiers are bragging about the beating of prisoners held at Gitmo, while other soldiers are on trial for throwing an Iraqi citizen into a hole and putting “at least 10 bullets in his head and chest after growing frustrated in their search for an insurgent.”

Back at home, Republican leadership is in the midst of a gay sex with a minor scandal and is desperately trying to hide/cover-up/spin the fact that Republican leaders knew about the diddling well before it became news. I can imagine those behind the scenes meetings, “Hey, guys how would you cover up this gay pederasty thing? I mean sodomy is one thing but votes are everything.”

Another scandal– no surprise– reaches the White House. Remember that lobbyist with no connections to Bush?

A key aide to presidential political strategist Karl Rove resigned Friday after a congressional report listed hundreds of contacts between disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the White House.

White House aide with ties to Abramoff resigns

And finally, Bush fights terrorism by not prosecuting a terrorist, and by harrassing innocent people. Is it any wonder that the President’s rating are at an all time low of 33%, that most Americans no longer trust the Republican party, and that rumors of impeachment ((Thanks for this one go to Mike the Mad Biologist, despite his horrible slander of rat-kind.)) just won’t go away?

Really, the cover of Time (( via CNN)) says it all. Now, that is a reality check!

Popularity: 1%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

There are currently 10 responses to “Blogs for a Reality Check”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On October 8th, 2006, Dave said:

    Just because they lowered the recruitment standards to allow people up to 45, who are mentally retarded, and physically can’t do the job makes great sense. This way you can get even more stupid people to join your army of 1.

  2. 2 On October 8th, 2006, themaiden said:

    Dave,

    I like how you think. Perhaps you’ve even shed some light on that “Army of One” ad campaign. Consider:

    I’ve always assumed that the ad slogan meant something like “One soldier is all it takes”. In light of your comment however, I wonder if it means something more like “If we add up the intelligence and competence of all the new recruits we’d have the equivalent of one good soldier”.

  3. 3 On October 10th, 2006, StealthBadger.net » Blog Archive » Mark Noonan: Deluded as Always said:

    [...] Update: Hell’s Handmaiden does a Noonan dissection, with extra goodness from around the media and no run-on sentences! Enjoy. ^.^ [...]

  4. 4 On October 10th, 2006, StealthBadger said:

    Bush did do one thing. For the first time in my life, I am now eligible for military service. This wouldn’t be strange, except for epilepsy (controlled with medication), asthma, never having met an allergen I didn’t react to, and being VERY nearsighted.

  5. 5 On October 10th, 2006, themaiden said:

    Well, Badger, ya gotta fill the ranks somehow.

    Come to think of it, I could probably get in the army too. Crippling allergies don’t matter much on a battlefield, right? What with all that dust and smoke and chemicals and things?

  6. 6 On October 10th, 2006, StealthBadger said:

    Yeah, well.

    Oh, did I mention that I’m turning FORTY in two months? Sheesh. I wasn’t eligible to serve when I was friggin 18, but I am at 39???

    Feh.

    Someone isn’t getting a clue. >.

  7. 7 On October 18th, 2006, Jeremy Pierce said:

    If person A hires person B, and person B hires person C, and person C is involved with a scandal with person D, it’s a bit of a stretch to claim that person A has ties to person D.

  8. 8 On October 18th, 2006, themaiden said:

    Jeremy,

    You must be talking about my comment concerning Abramoff.

    True, if I hired someone who worked in an office in another city and then that person hired a person who worked in yet another city and who became involved in a scandal, the link between that person and myself would be pretty tenuous. However, if I hired an assistant who worked closely with me on a daily basis, and that person hired an assistant who worked under the same conditions, the link is not so tenuous. And you know that, Jeremy.

  9. 9 On December 4th, 2006, dave said:

    Are there sources to these numbers? (i.e. advertisment budget etc)

  10. 10 On December 4th, 2006, themaiden said:

    dave,

    I believe that I’ve cited all of my sources for these numbers. What sources Noonan used, I don’t know.

Leave a Reply