26th April 2007 Stumble it!

O’Leary: Prophetess of Misdirection

posted in Intelligent Design by themaiden |

O’Leary… comedian, pinball wizard, rising ID star, big fish in Dembski’s very dirty pool, and now…

Imagine that. In nations where the public school systems are increasingly unable to find common ground among competing interest groups, these home schooling menaces want to provide religious and moral instruction to their own children.

Home schooling: A worry to materialists?

O’Leary knows damn well that the objection isn’t to parents providing religious and moral instruction to their kids. Perhaps, as the article says, this is the motivation for homeschooling, but certainly O’Leary knows that she is misdirecting. The problem is that religion and morals is only part of what the kids get taught. The rest of what they get is bad science– wretchedly bad voodoo snake oil garbage.

These students are part of a large, well-organised movement that is empowering parents to teach their children creationist biology and other unorthodox versions of science at home, all centred on the idea that God created Earth in six days about 6000 years ago.

Home-schooling special: Preach your children well

What the kids get is all that science that hasn’t actually been able to pass muster as science.

He is appalled by some home-schooling textbooks, especially those on biology that claim they have scientific reasons for rejecting evolution. “They have gross scientific inaccuracies in them,” he says. “They would not be allowed in any public school in the US, and yet these are the books primarily featured in home-schooling bookstores.”

One such textbook is Science of the Physical Creation from A Beka Book, a leading retailer of home-schooling books based in Pensacola, Florida. It argues: “Evolution is a concept that attempts to free man from God and his responsibility to his Creator.” Alters worries for the students who learn from such texts (see “Book learnin’”). “If they go on to secular university, home-schoolers are in for some major surprises when they get into an introductory biology class.”

Home-schooling special: Preach your children well

The following is enlightening, emphasis mine.

“Christians increasingly have an advantage in the educational enterprise,” he says. “This is evident in the success of Christian home-schooled children, as compared to their government-schooled friends who have spent their time constructing their own truths.”

Home-schooling special: Preach your children well

Let me translate: The government-schooled friends have “constructed their own truths” by actually looking at the evidence and learning about verifiable facts. This is bad. It should be contrasted with what is good– buying wholesale the mythology recorded in a two thousand to twenty-four hundred book.

And yes this does scare me. It scares me every bit as much as it would scare me if doctors were trained to treat patients based upon the humors. It scares me as much as it would scare me to know that the engineer building the city had been well seasoned with the convoluted ‘reasoning’ required to defend such nonsense as the biblical Flood. See, you can’t train your brain to short circuit itself and expect that damage to be restricted only to particular areas. The damage spills over and pollutes the whole pond.

Oh, and you are still getting that ‘materialism‘ thing wrong, Denyse. Think naturalism.

Popularity: 1%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

There are currently 2 responses to “O’Leary: Prophetess of Misdirection”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On April 27th, 2007, JR said:

    Let me just throw this out at you. It’s a theory I have, based on absolutely no scientific evidence that I’m aware of. I have found that those who are religious believe what they believe as intensely as I believe what I believe. And I use that word ‘believe’ ambiguously, being conscious that the term ‘belief’ has a different meaning to people of faith than to, let us say, people of science.

    What is this? How can another human being see the same thing I see and come up with such completely different results? What if that itself is a product of nature, of evolution? That’s my theory. What if nature tries to keep a balance between faith and reason just like it does between predator and prey, or animal and environment. Too much faith-based humanity can be a counter-productive thing, as can not enough hope (for lack of a better contrast).

    Anyway, that’s what my brain has come up with in trying to process, well, all the things you process.

  2. 2 On April 27th, 2007, themaiden said:

    Nature doesn’t ‘try’ to do anything. It just shakes out that way. There might be some advantage to faith though– just like there is an advantage to having an appendix and to wisdom teeth.

Leave a Reply