30th June 2007 Stumble it!

Christian thinkmag wars over intelligent design

posted in Intelligent Design by themaiden |

With friends like these you don’t people like me telling the world that ID is a front for religion.

Christian thinkmag wars over intelligent design?: I have cause for hope, the tiny knot of genuinely orthodox Christians who hope to rescue Darwinism as it actually is for Christ have no influence whatever.

Post-Darwinist: Christian thinkmag wars over intelligent design?: I have cause for hope

Brilliant, Denyse. She goes on to demonstrate how strongly ideology trumps substance.

Right then. The book was allegedly written to Southern Baptist “pastors”, and therein lies its primary usefulness. It is likely to prove an excellent crap detector: Any pastor who takes Wilson seriously should be defrocked.

Post-Darwinist: Christian thinkmag wars over intelligent design?: I have cause for hope

Truly, with friends like these…

Popularity: 2%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

There are currently 2 responses to “Christian thinkmag wars over intelligent design”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On June 30th, 2007, kip152 said:

    Thanks to Denyse, I do have hope. I didn’t realize atheists were the majority!

  2. 2 On June 30th, 2007, themaiden said:

    Only among some segments of the educated populace.

    O’Leary links to UncommonDescent as a source– bad start– and she links to an article she wrote for UncommonDescent. That article links to an article in The American Scientist which show a high percentage of atheists in fields related to evolutionary biology. The same in not true in other areas of acedemia, but atheism still fairs better than in the general population.

    What is interesting is that rather than ask why some biologists tend so strongly toward atheism, she immediately concludes that the atheism is responsible for the biology. I’d bet the causality is the other way ’round.

Leave a Reply