16th November 2007 Stumble it!

Creation Science at its best

posted in Creationism by themaiden |

There is a very good article about a bit of creationist dishonesty over at The Thinkers’ Podium. It is the tale of an edited interview with Dawkins. Its a good read.

Popularity: 2%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

This entry was posted on Friday, November 16th, 2007 at 10:39 am and is filed under Creationism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 4 responses to “Creation Science at its best”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On November 16th, 2007, JR said:

    I was going to say that one would think in the era of youtube such laughable attempts to edit the answer are both pathetic and telling, but then I remembered this was in 1997, ten years ago. Doesn’t quite work today like it used to, which is probably why they came up with conservapedia.com and qube.tv, lest their readers come across any counter-arguments on mainstream liberal sites like youtube and wikipedia.com.

  2. 2 On November 17th, 2007, themaiden said:

    JR,

    It is really just the video version of the quote mining that creationists have long been fond of.

  3. 3 On May 1st, 2008, little man said:

    I think you people should know more about what you’re talking about before you start making silly accusations like “creationist dishonesty.” Let us not forget that many evolutionists in the past have blatantly lied to us before,remember all those fake ‘missing links’?

  4. 4 On May 1st, 2008, themaiden said:

    little man,

    Let’s try this: you provide something to back up your point. You see. I provided something to back up mine– that would be the link and the lengthy article there. If you object, toss out something solid. ‘You’re wrong and you should learn something’ really just doesn’t have any bite. Let me illustrate: ‘No! You are wrong and you should learn something!’. Now, don’t you feel defeated? Yeah, nor do I.

Leave a Reply