28th December 2007 Stumble it!

But I paid for it!

posted in Education by themaiden |

I’ve been thinking a lot about grade inflation over the past few months, mostly because I am on the front lines of it. That is, I’ve been grading papers– a lot of them. I’ve been through 500 or so pages of freshman, mostly, attempts at writing philosophy… well, let me rephrase that… attempts at thinking for the first time in their short lives. Of course, each student is having thoughts they’ve never had before and each and every one of them thinks these thoughts are original and genius. They are neither.

Mostly, I don’t say this critically. I think that an obsession with ‘unique’ is intellectual poison. We ought to be concerned more with ‘accurate’ and, frankly, if someone else has it right you can’t be both ‘unique’ and ‘accurate’ about that thing. The ‘genius’ part I do find annoying, but the brunt of the criticism isn’t aimed at the kids. There seems to be something– self esteem issues perhaps?– embedded in the educational system that leads these kids to believe that every one of their little brain farts is exciting and valuable. They aren’t, and it is a dis-service to everyone to leave them with that impression.

And so to my topic of grade inflation.

Teachers who push most students above a C grade only defeat the purpose of grades to motivate students to do better or to help parents and employers to distinguish abilities. Once graduates enter the job market, they discover they can’t bank on those undeserved grades.

Licking Grade Inflation

Like I said, “it is a dis-service to everyone”. Why expect careful thought from someone whose sloppy thinking has never been challenged?

But there are problems.

Professors get the message pretty quickly that “A” students give them good reviews that lead to tenure and raises - while the opposite occurs for tough graders.

Licking Grade Inflation

Not to mention that…

… the truly outstanding and industrious student is wronged. Grading is about fundamental fairness. Not everyone performs exceptionally well and should not be deceived into thinking they have. Nobody’s achievements should be cheapened by a leveling of grades.

Grade inflation is not a victimless crime

And so to me. The rules of thumb given me for issuing those grades prevented me from giving the grade actually deserved. I feel guilty.

Maybe, though, it isn’t so bad. Perhaps there is hope for anyone willing to face the whining of students who got a D, deserved an F, and think they earned an A.

Despite dozens of empirical studies to the contrary, fear that students will retaliate on their course evaluations is the myth fueling grade inflation that is hardest to debunk. Faculty often are convinced that their popularity and even their jobs are at risk, that somehow they can buy respect with higher grades, and that students are so easily duped by undeserved grades that they will return the favor with higher evaluations.

Grade inflation is not a victimless crime

Still haven’t explained my title have I? Someone I know relates this problem to the tendency of students to view grades/diplomas as commodities to be purchased. Pay your money; get your product. One wonders if the same logic applies to, say, pilot’s licenses.

Popularity: 2%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

There are currently 6 responses to “But I paid for it!”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On December 28th, 2007, JSexton said:

    Not just teachers giving easy grades.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=504805&in_page_id=1770

  2. 2 On December 28th, 2007, themaiden said:

    That, JSexton, is yet another frustrating aspect of this problem.

  3. 3 On December 28th, 2007, Aaron said:

    I agree that grade inflation is a problem, and should be combated. I think sometimes there is a disproportionate reaction in the opposite direction though. I will site two personal experiences.

    One was in an undergraduate literature class. By the middle of the class I had done several papers that would come back with Bs but had no corrections or suggestions for improvement. When I went to talk to the instructor I was told that she did not believe in As. When I asked if there was any possible way that I could get an A she told me that I would have to totally exceed her expectations and present work that she could not even imagine. She also mentioned several times that grade inflation was a serious problem. Incidentally she was soon let go because her classes would invariably be too small and were canceled once she was announced as the instructor and people dropped out.

    The second case was in a Power I class. This is a junior level electrical engineering class and the material is fairly extensive, but easy to master. Being a junior level class anyone that would have a problem with the material was weeded out before making it to this point. In order to obtain a grade distribution the instructor made the tests lengthy enough that it was impossible to finish and would curve the test based on the number of questions answered. This meant the primary focus of the students moved from mastering the material presented to mastering speed testing techniques. This did provide a grade distribution, but I fail to see how anyone was helped by that.

    Grade inflation should not occur. Instructors should work to provide grades that accurately reflect the student’s mastery of the course material. They should also guard against the temptation to deflate grades in an attempt to offset grade inflation and to impose arbitrary means to get a grade distribution among a group of students that genuinely has little to differentiate it.

  4. 4 On December 28th, 2007, themaiden said:

    Aaron,

    That is a very good point. Grade deflation is conceivably just as bad. Basically, you are right. Grades should “accurately reflect the student’s mastery of the course material”– not more, not less.

  5. 5 On December 28th, 2007, Tully said:

    “the truly outstanding and industrious student is wronged. Grading is about fundamental fairness. Not everyone performs exceptionally well and should not be deceived into thinking they have. Nobody’s achievements should be cheapened by a leveling of grades.”

    Do we not teach them to critically grade themselves in addition to what we assign? If not, we do them a true disservice. If nothing else, I would hope that I have given my students the ability to understand that I grade them based on my understanding of what it takes to get the next level. If they feel I have missed the mark the with another student, it should not cheapen nor over aggrandize their own depth of knowledge. If it does, I have failed on at least one level.

  6. 6 On December 29th, 2007, themaiden said:

    Tully,

    Do we not teach them to critically grade themselves in addition to what we assign?

    Do we? I don’t know. You’d certainly want a student to take self evaluation seriously. I’m not sure that kind of attitude can be taught. Perhaps it can.

    As for the rest, I am a bit unsure what you are claiming. You grade students on different scales? Better students are judged more harshly based on “what it takes to get the next level”? A mistake grading one student shouldn’t cheapen the grades of the other students?

Leave a Reply