8th March 2008 Stumble it!

Climb out of the bottle

posted in Society by themaiden |

A rational scale to assess the harm of drugs. Data source is the March 24, 2007 article: Nutt, David, Leslie A King, William Saulsbury, Colin Blakemore. Image via WikipediaAnd pick up with Acid, X, and weed.

A new study of recreational drug use out of the UK has reached some startling conclusions. The study headed up by professor David Nutt of Britain’s Bristol University and his colleagues have proposed a new framework for classifying recreational drugs and harmful substances. Within this new framework alcohol and tobacco were listed higher on the danger scale then other more notorious drugs like: LSD, Ecstasy and Cannabis (more commonly referred to as marijuana). Here is the list of the twenty harmful substances with the number one spot and title of most harmful drug going to Heroin.

Study Finds: Marijuana, LSD and Ecstacy Less Dangerous Then Alcohol and Tobacco - Associated Content

Interesting isn’t it? The ’safe’ drug is more dangerous than the one that makes you see things that aren’t there.

The Big Four aren’t really that surprising, though I’d have guessed that meth would rank higher still:

1. HEROIN

2. COCAINE

3. BARBITURATES

4. STREET METHADONE

The point?

I like the approach the this researcher has taken. The study is in effect an attempt to rethink attitudes toward particular drugs, with an eye to law. I won’t argue that some drugs need to be regulated, but it is hard to deny that current drug laws are confused collections of old prejudice and weird mythology. David Nutt focused the right issues: “The physical harm done to the user, the drugs potential for addiction, and its impact on society as a whole.” As an evaluation of potential danger, he seems to have nailed it. Honestly though, insofar as this study is used in lawmaking, I’d prefer it if the focus were entirely on the impact on society as a whole because, 1) the other two concerns reduce to that third one in large part and 2) that is the only basis on which we have any business crafting legislation.

Popularity: 1%

Love the post? Hate it? Please let me know. Leave a comment and spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • Netvouz
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb
  • NewsVine
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Blue Dot
  • DotNetKicks
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MyShare
  • Netscape
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Taggly
  • ThisNext
  • Webride
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis

There are currently 4 responses to “Climb out of the bottle”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On March 8th, 2008, Steve said:

    The original study is kind of old by now…

  2. 2 On March 8th, 2008, themaiden said:

    Steve,

    I think I’m going to have to ask you to back up your claim because it looks to me like the study isn’t more than a few years old. I’m finding publication dates of 2007 and dates for related material in 2006.

    But, ok. So what? Even if the study is several decades old, if it hasn’t been overturned then it stands. Age alone has little to do with accuracy.

    So I suppose what I need to know is “What is your point?” and “What do you have to back it?”

  3. 3 On March 20th, 2008, Nascar said:

    great blog, although it’s no surprise cigarettes rank higher. after all, outside every AA,NA, etc. meeting people stand around smoking. peopel can kick a crack habit but cant put down the marlboros

  4. 4 On March 20th, 2008, themaiden said:

    Nascar,

    I know. Nicotine if unbelievably addictive. It puts some of the hard drugs to shame.

Leave a Reply